That explains what I found so mysterious - that while they talked about socialism they disregarded the plight of the workers resulting from the export of jobs. And they don't really want socialism they want the perks of socialism = absolute control of the economy so as to direct benefits to themselves. And we're not out of the woods yet but we were in more danger when it seemed very unlikely that a former Secretary of State, the head of the FBI and the head of the CIA would conspire against the elected President, trying overthrow him by disinformation and leaks. It seems to me that this was an attempt to turn the US into a socialist state by a media / intelligence coup. But no standard is too low in the pursuit of getting Trump. My editor would laugh in my face if I tried to publish an article with such flimsy of sourcing. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.”ĭid you get that? Anonymous sources claiming to be familiar with other anonymous sources on the Mueller team are the source for the New York Times article. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Add to that list a new leak reported by the New York Times, “Some of Robert S. To name two awful examples: the leak of the Cohen/Trump audio recording that appears to have been seized by the feds and the leak of the written questions to the president. The Mueller team has never had to prove anything involving Trump-Russian collusion to anyone because the special counsel needs no proof to function as a potent political weapon.” As I recently wrote, “It has been three years of innuendo and leaks, leaks, leaks, leaks, and uncountable more examples of leaks dripping poison into the poison-addicted pens of the partisan media.
![amanpour shadow president amanpour shadow president](https://cdn.podimo.com/images/dd7b97af-1cbe-4617-b4d5-9a57f89f186b_400x400.png)
Contrary to the public narrative that the team was “leak-proof,” the opposite is actually true. Mueller’s team has played dirty from the start.
![amanpour shadow president amanpour shadow president](https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/styles/1200w/public/2017-11/rsz_1gettyimages-871910228.jpg)
So at least in the short run, the damage to the left is greater. Brennan knew: he worked hard to run operatives at the camping to fabricate the dirt himself. But they had nothing, nothing of consequence. But progs still miscalculated: they gambled that Trump would fold or that a tiny bit of dirt would suffice. Of course the process did enormous damage, to Trump and to the system. Schumer's tone is the tell: progs have no principles but power-all the decades of lefty criticism of intel operatives running wild disappeared pronto, when the Deep State turned out to be a Dem tool.
![amanpour shadow president amanpour shadow president](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/.e/img/3.0/branding/backgrounds/amanpour/amanpour-background-large.jpg)
The MSM did their bidding, leaking fake news, giving a platform to the Brennan smears. The Deep State took over, first to prevent Trump's victory, then to insure that he wouldn't take or keep office. Hill colluded with foreign agents and Russians to stop Trump. Now the world knows, at least the right and the sane lefties. Trump intuited the "very strange" attack on him from the beginning. "From what I'm told, they are very upset with how he has treated them." 3'ers are who - with cooperation and support from the DNC - went after Trump. This is a hugely broad generalization of course, but #3 is who you want to grow eyes in the back of your head for.
![amanpour shadow president amanpour shadow president](https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/200316193107-bernie-joe-elbow-large-169.jpg)
Not necessarily employed within the agencies themselves but boy oh boy do they make huge amounts as outside contractors. Seldom come from MI, mostly beltway people from elite universities with impeccable resumes and no small amount of early groundwork in politics or the military industrial complex (companies like LockMart etc.). These are the outside professionals and lifers for whom the intelligence business is about power, manipulation, money, getting what you want and revenge on who you want. 'Management' are decent too, it's just that they end up having to juggle too many competing interests as well as the ocean of scumbags both on your side and not, and it tends to make them jaded and combative.ģ) The 'climbers' and the consultants. Management is what takes on the bureaucratic/administrative drudgery and also ends up dealing with the worst the world has to offer in people. These organizations are political but they can get broken into 2 groups, analysts (super smart people) and 'management'. 2) They get recruited into the 'bigger' leagues. Tend to start out as low 'social pathology' people until. Speaking as a former 'intelligence' professional, you can break them down into roughly 3 groupsġ) MI (Military Intelligence) - Smart, honorable, not always 100% correct, but with their hearts in the right place with loyalty to both the nation, service, and their comrades.